Calendar

July 2017
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 << < > >>
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Announce

Who's Online?

Member: 0
Visitor: 1

rss Syndication

Several strategies to methods are you can find and yes it simply is reliant on discovering selection for you that will help eliminate this disorder effectively. Many who have had to deal with panic and anxiety attacks previously have developed their particular methods to eliminating this disorder which have been effective for them, which you'll want to discover with the Panic away opinions. Find out more to do with this process and find out about the is suffering from of others to be able to permanently throw away living your life having fear.





Math reading problems can be intimidating, especially for beginners. They differ from ordinary computational problems owing to computation, the strategy has already been presented. Word problems require more logical reasoning and deduction, which garners more of a stigma and heightened wariness towards them. However, you'll find things you can do to reduce the anxiety, to make it more engaging. Follow these comprehension methods to make math reading problems less frustrating to train, and fewer daunting to learn.




The Panic Away program was created so that those being affected by anxiety can overcome this issue and enjoy life normally again. This program includes all-natural techniques that don't involve any utilization of medication in any way. These techniques have been known to be extremely effective and also have helped a lot of sufferers around. With natural treatment, you're certain to eliminate this condition permanently.



When system standby can be used over a laptop, you have to make sure that you can have enough energy to maintain it sleeping; whether or not this were to - solve your problems exhaust electricity, any data that's being trapped in memory is going to be lost because the details are trapped in volatile memory. Volatile memory only holds onto data if you have energy keeping it running. Take away the juice and you'll forget important computer data. If used correctly, that is for shorter period of non use, system standby is a superb tool.




The good news is that panic attacks and anxiousness undoubtedly are a behavioural pattern that you simply acquired as time passes when you are talking to stressful stimulus. Any kind of behaviour that is certainly acquired could be unlearned as well. This is how to avoid panic attacks naturally. Although there are natural cures for anxiety attacks such as natural herbs they only offer you short-lived reduction as the key's unlearn this behavour as opposed to manage it using drugs or herbal remedies.



Admin · 81 views · 0 comments
04 Mar 2014
1. The Standard or Manual Espresso Machine



As you might have guessed from the name, the standard, or manual, espresso machine requires the person making the coffee to be on top of things. You must buy coffee grounds or grind your own coffee beans. If you are trying to make a cappuccino or latte, be sure to man the frother controls. Add your filter, coffee grounds, and water. That's about all there is to this manual espresso machine, which isn't as truly manual as the old coffee presses.



2. The Semi Automatic Espresso Machine



There is not really such a category of espresso machine as semi automatic, so we will just give this label to the automatic espresso machines that are not truly automatic. These machines in most. Visit vet brody evans's resources on SITE TOPIC GOES HERE shop electrics espresso and bestcases will require coffee grounds, but some have a built in coffee bean grinder. After you have added the filter and beans and filled the water reservoir, you can turn on the semi automatic espresso machine. It will do the rest for you. Don't forget to turn off the semi automatic espresso maker when it is done.



3. The right here Automatic Espresso Machine



Obviously, the automatic espresso maker automatically makes espresso. If you have bought a brand name automatic espresso maker, you should expect the automatic espresso machine to automatically make great espresso. How automatic can automatic be? Well, most of these machines attach directly to your plumbing. And of course they all grind your choice coffee beans up for you. However, you do have to put the beans in the machine yourself, as there is no intake line ranging to the local coffee store or grocery store. Also, you will either have to program the timer for when you want your espressos made each day or push the start button for quick espresso. When the machine is done with the coffee grounds, it will place them in an internal disposal area. They will need cleaned out of this area manually after every so many cups of coffee.




As you might guess, the cost of an automatic espresso machine can be quite cost prohibitive for home use, even if you are a sincere coffee lover. This is why the semi automatic and manual espresso machines are available. If you happen to would love better information in relation to SITE TOPIC GOES HERE ; go to reviews guide or possibly blog at once.


The former for the coffee lover on a budget or limited space, the latter for people who just want an espresso.



Of course, if you really just cannot live without your coffee and you make a good living, the automatic espresso machine may just be your dream machine. You work hard for your money each day, you might as well start each day with ease, relaxation, and the fresh aroma of great espresso. Instead of going to bed dreading waking up the next morning, you will be going to bed each night knowing your espresso machine will take care of you in the morning in the most caring of ways.








Admin · 56 views · 0 comments
19 Nov 2013
Properly fixing your skin to assist prevent acne outbreaks will get very expensive, especially when you're constantly buying some of the commercially made medicines for acne. There are however many natural acne medication techniques you can use that will save a little money and help to take care of your acne problem. Here are some tips on creating and ultizing a homemade acne mask to rid your epidermis of acne.A simple homemade acne mask that is effective in treating pimples and removing toxic oils is to use baking soda and fresh lemon juice. In a small bowl pour in certain baking soda and then put in a little lemon juice. Stir the mix together until it's not lumpy. If you should boost the liquidity in the mask, add a bit more freshly squeezed lemon juice. You want a lumpy free paste that is still thick enough to lather onto the skin.Make sure that you use baking soda rather than baking powder. For the lemon juice you want pure freshly squeezed lemon juice extract, not merely a lemon flavored juice designed for kids to drink.You can lather this homemade acne mask on to your face, back, neck, and elsewhere maybe you have a pimple problem. Baking soda and freshly squeezed lemon juice masks work perfect for a lot of people to help you rid their skin of acne. If you need something a whole lot stronger for the acne breakouts then make this happen with acne face mask with baking soda and bleach.Using bleach coupled with baking soda rather than fresh lemon juice is wonderful for many people; nonetheless it can be extremely harsh on your epidermis so ensure you've tried the lemon juice homemade acne mask first before moving on to the hydrogen peroxide variation. If you have sensitive skin than the method may not work well in your case. If take a look you site suffer from extreme acne and wish to deal with the problem from the pimples a baking soda and peroxide mask could possibly be just the arsenal you should finally rid the face and back from the ugly pimples.Baking soda and bleach is one from the best homemade acne masks that can assist to alleviate extreme acne. The combination of baking soda and peroxide work great to suck the oils out of your facial pores that can cause acne blemishes. Do not leave the homemade acne facial mask on for more than fifteen minutes as it can rapidly dry out your skin. Start with 5 minutes, after which progress up to quarter-hour when you test to see the optimal rate for keeping this acne mask on your epidermis for maximum acne removal with the least volume of skin drying.After applying the baking soda and bleach acne mask it can be imperative that you fully wash and rinse your skin to adopt off the homemade acne mask. After you take away the acne mask fully let your skin invest some time being exposed to air when you apply any lotion and other skin moisturizers. Many people who use baking soda and peroxide go for a skin moisturizer to help replenish the hydration with the skin. When you choose a moisturizer make certain that it can be a natural skin lubricant that may not clog up your skin pores and cause further acne problems.Hopefully you can use the baking soda and fresh lemon juice homemade acne mask or the baking soda and bleach anyone to reclaim healthy and acne free skin.Further Reading about Acne Treatments:Doxycycline for AcneInnovative Acne Treatments You Have Never TriedThe Best Acne Scar Treatments

When you've got your natural aloe vera plant, all you have to do is cut-off one of several fronds and squeeze the gel right into a blender. Adding a squeeze of lemon juice is a superb addition to the gel - you won't only have the skin softening advantages of the aloe, but you'll have the colour fading great things about the lemon juice too. In any case, lemon is a wonderful preserver and will keep the lotion you're making inside fridge approximately every week.



You must select an acne cure according to your epidermis, as well as sensitivity. This is very essential in order to be sure that the issue won't reoccur. Changes for your lifestyle and the things that you consume also can go a long way for making certain that acne remains something of the past. Let us take a look at the many treatment options that one could try in your house:



Since many of today's medications are harsh and carry the risk of devastating negative effects, try a natural acne treatment? The advantages to natural acne treatment are that you avoid ever needing to see a dermatologist, one's body may benefit from healthier eating, and you're simply not exposing your epidermis to harsh chemicals. While herbal products contain many natural facial treatment ingredients to help eliminate pimples and blackheads giving you skin, you are going to normally discover a combination of acne ingredients with a blend of natural emollient's and skin soothing properties.



As for the moderate acne condition, the measures for mild acne condition can be applied here, although not to increase that you are longing for. It takes longer time to remove acne from a face. You need additional medication of some type for moderate acne condition. Most of dermatologist will most likely prescribe a topical clindamycin, erythromycin, benzoyl peroxide, or salicylic acid to your treatment. For maximum result, cystic acne should be excised as a way to let out necrotic tissues trapped within your skin. If not, the redness may take a long time to subside, and may leave that person with a reddish bumps where the breakout had occurred.




Many people who are suffering from adult acne can attest that topical treatment work and contains reduced the seriousness of their skin ailment. Topical strategy to acne is available in varieties of creams, lotions, gels, and solutions. More often than not, a topical medication contains benzoyl peroxide plus a topical antimicrobial like clindamycin or erythromycin. These two antimicrobial are been shown to be very effective for treating mild to moderate acne in grown-ups. The topical clindamycine combined with retinoid could be more efficient in acne treatment. Often, these topical medications need a prescription before it's possible to obtain in pharmaceuticals. Another effective creams that exist over-the-counter are items that contain sodium sulfacetamide and sulfur.







Before you go to bed, massage the mixture into your face, in the type of breathing filter. When you get up each day, simply rinse them back with domestic hot water and employ a natural soap to eliminate the others. I recommend which you give the face the light scrub with something like a loofah sponge too, with the added exfoliation effect. Always think about the main issue when you're doing a natural acne scar remedy program.
Admin · 40 views · 0 comments
07 Nov 2013
A recent interview in Frankfurt’s FAZ newspaper:

Dr. Schirrmacher: And then, just to find a starting point, maybe we can start with the personal, and then at least I would ask you both. Maybe that is a good starting point, very basic: What is the future of Europe? So, what do you conceive what will happen, and what is going to happen? Sie können sich auch gegenseitig … Now, Michael Hudson, you are in Germany and you are known to our readers, and Sahra Wagenknecht, of course, as well. Just very briefly your background. In your DNA, in your genetic code, you have traces of Indian roots.

Prof. Hudson: Well, I am one-eighth (Chippewa) Indian, so I’m half Irish, a quarter Swiss, one eighth English. I grew up in Minneapolis, which was the center of America’s labor movement in the 1930s. The general strike in 1936 shaped the American labor scene.

Minnesota had a governor, Floyd B. Olson, who said that he hoped capitalism run right to hell. The Trotskyists were the main opponents of the Stalinists at that time. The irony is that you had the right wing ganging up with the Stalinists, all against the Trotskyist leadership because the Stalinists feared that a non-communist socialist leadership would build up the labor unions, as Minnesota was building up the Teamsters. So in 1941 my father became one of the Minneapolis 17, the first people committed under the Smith Act. This was ostensibly against advocating the overthrow of the government by force and violence, defined so loosely that in the presentation before the jury, it meant simply having the works of Marx and Lenin on your bookshelf.

I later was asked, when I went to work for Herman Kahn at the Hudson Institute, whether there was any reason why I could not get a top secret security clearance. I mentioned that my father was a Trotskyist leader, and he said: Oh, they know about that, that Stalin and Roosevelt made a deal around 1941 that if Roosevelt would prosecute the Trotskyists, the Communist Party promised not to pull out any of its Labor unions on strike during the balance of the war. The U.S. Attorney General later wrote in his autobiography that it was the only thing that was ashamed of doing, because by no stretch of the imagination could the Trotskyists have been any threat to the country.

In fact, it was the Trotskyists that called in the National Guard to protect the workers and the strikers against the police force that was working on behalf of the large companies. The lawyer for the Trotskyists in the trial was Al Goldman, who had been a colleague of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. As I was growing up, most of the radicals who were still living throughout the world and from the United States would come to my house, and tell me their stories and their experiences.

Dr. Schirrmacher: What could they say about Luxemburg and Liebknecht?

Prof. Hudson: Al Goldman was still trying to find out who was responsible for killing them. But we decided that it really does not matter who the individuals are. They are usually killed by their bodyguards. The key is people behind them that order the killing.

Dr. Schirrmacher: But you don’t have a memory of an anecdote or whatsoever, an anecdote about Luxemburg or Liebknecht, what they …

Prof. Hudson: No. Mainly, they talked about revolutionary theory. I wanted to grow up and go to jail like all of the people that my family admired, and their colleagues admired. So now I’m ashamed that I’ve never been able to go to the University of the Revolution.

Dr. Schirrmacher: But you worked with Kahn, and I remember that Kahn was the person who proclaimed golden ages ahead of us. And he was the futurist who always said we will be so happy and so lucky. Am I right?

Prof. Hudson: Yes, he was basically a military theorist who wrote a very good book on atomic warfare, saying that some people would survive. He was the model for “Dr. Strangelove”. And he felt so bad from being attacked for his military theory – and he was indeed a brilliant military theorist – that he decided to form the Corporate Environment study. But he was wrong in almost everything economic he said, so he brought me on to disagree with him on everything, as a foil. We liked each other. He was a very nice guy. In fact, we liked each other so much that we could not believe that the other person actually believed what they were saying publicly.

Herman Kahn weighed 400 pounds. I remember once in Paris, we were leaving the hotel to go to the airport, and I tried to hand him his pants. As far as my hands would stretch, they still weren’t long enough for the waist. He also had narcolepsy. When he was not speaking at a public lecture, he would fall asleep – usually in his food. He would rise from the table with the food flowing down his necktie, talking about the world economy an expanding pie, and in another generation, the whole world could live just like him. And everybody would go on diet, over a long time.

One of the big problems we had was when he wanted me to project the gross national product and hence living standards at 6 % or 4 % per year, which economists were doing at that time. He thought that all the technology and power somehow would make all countries rich. I refused to make that calculation, even though when I joined the Institute I insisted that the one perk that I wanted was an HP 75 calculator that could calculate exponential growth. I told Herman that the only growth that is exponential is financial – the magic of compound interest. And the more compound interest grows, the more it slows the economy, like driving a car with the brake on.

So that is where we differed. It turned out that most of his clients ended up hiring me instead of him, and I ended up getting a collection of Tibetan art as a result, and buying enough real estate, so, I’ve never had to work ever since and could spend all of my time writing.

Prof. Hudson: You talked about rescuing the banks, and that is really a phrase for trying to rescue a whole financial growth function to somehow save debts that can’t be paid. The question is: Who is going to take the loss? It really is trying to keep the debt overhead in place, by making the public sector absorb all the losses of the banks that have made the bad loan. And beyond this, it is really an ideology – an ideology that somehow the debts can all be paid. And beyond that, there is something else. Saving the banks is a slogan …

Dr. Schirrmacher: Sahra Wagenknecht, did I get you right that you say they can be paid?

Wagenknecht: They can’t. Also vorläufig können sie immer wieder, aber irgendwann …

Dr. Schirrmacher: Wegen der oberen 1 %.

Wagenknecht: … The upper class has to take the losses.

Prof. Hudson: The bailout is not saving the banks. The banks could function very well the next day after a debt cancellation. You are saving the bank stockholders and the bondholders and the rich counterparties to the banks. You are saving the gamblers who have accounts with the banks, not saving the banks.

But there is something even worse. The slogan “saving the banks” means a program for the governments to be financially responsible, which means financially self-destructive. The bailout is forcing Greece to sell its public domain, its water and sewer systems, its land, its real estate, its buildings, to sell to private buyers who are going to borrow money at interest from the bank to buy these public assets, and to treat them like a toll road.

So in the broadest sense of the term, saving the banks means to achieve by financial terms what it took an army militarily to counter a thousand years ago. Saving the banks thus is destroying society. Is that worth the payment?

Dr. Schirrmacher: Very good and very understandable, but a question again. We can’t be too economic but … You say, you don’t save the banks. But what is, let’s say, my life insurance. What they say to me is that my bank has Staatsanleihen from …, at a normal average term too, so I would lose as an average person … I mean, by saving the banks, don’t they save me as well?

Prof. Hudson: No, that’s the trick that they are playing. For instance, in the United States the largest bank is Citibank. That was insolvent as a result of being one of the most abusive fraudulent banks with junk mortgages and similar gambles. The head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Sheila Bair, said that she argued with the Obama administration saying that she could close down Citibank and save all of the insured depositors. She could have saved all of the basic banking functions.

The only people who would not have been saved would have been the gamblers at the top, on whom Citibank had written derivative gambles. It is as if in a horse race somebody goes to the casino and gambles, and then can’t pay their debt. The casinos say: We can’t operate at all, if the losers can’t pay what they owe. So, you – the government – have to levy a tax, to enable the losers to pay the winners.

It’s true that not everybody’s savings would have been saved under this plan. But normal operations would have been. And it’s the same with AIG, the Insurance conglomerate that was bailed out with $184 billion dollars. All this loss went through the London office making financial gambles, losing bets as to which way interest rates and junk mortgages would move. The government could simply have closed down AIG, taking it over and said: We are saving all of your normal insurance policies, we are saving all of your normal business, but the gamblers we are just not paying.

But in that case, Goldman Sachs would not have been paid $18 billion dollars. And Goldman Sachs had its representative Hank Paulson as Secretary of the Treasury. The Treasury was paying its private colleagues on Wall Street, instead of saving the normal depositors. The intention of this bank bailout is to wipe out the normal depositors and only save the rich of the top. Pretending to save the poor, the working class,and the middle class, they want to save everything for the top 1%. That is what they did with Citibank, and that is what they did with AIG. Citibank makes money by lending to people like Sam Zell, who would buy a company, look at the pension funds or Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), and empty them out to pay his creditors. So, what the government is saving are the parasitic functions of the banks.

Dr. Schirrmacher: To make it clear, and ask Frau Wagenknecht too: It could be possible not to save the banks, und würde trotzdem nicht diese Lebensversicherungen und Alters … das kann man trennen?



Dr. Schirrmacher: Nein, that is very important for you to understand that people like me, I take me as a durchschnittliche …, believe in a kind of empirical or scientific rationality and all this stuff. And if I am told by Hans Werner Sinn or other people, der frühere Regierungssprecher, Ulrich Wilhelm, you have to save the banks because then you save your life assurance, for example, then I believe it, and everybody believes it, because you say: Well, they are mathematicians or whatsoever.

Prof. Hudson: What if I say: You have to make me rich in order to give me an incentive not to wreck society. What the banks are really saying is that: We will wreck the payment system, and we will stop paying, and we will cause a crisis if you don’t give us what we want. We are holding you hostage.

But all you really have to do is take them over and replace them with other people. You save the basic banking and insurance functions. There are plenty of good assets in there. Even junk mortgages are worth something. They are worth enough to save all of the normal activities for 90 % of the population. The losers in this case would only be the 10 % at the top … And all these gains for the last 20 years have been to the top 10 %. They would lose their gains – but there is enough to pay everybody else.

Dr. Schirrmacher: Normal understanding is, politicians need majorities, and not the 10 % of the top.

Prof. Hudson: You talk about empirical studies. If the statistics were publicized to show what I am talking about, everybody would see in chart form that there is enough money there. The Federal Reserve has them. There are many statistics available, but the newspapers don’t publish them. They find it politically incorrect to do so.

What they call “class war” is simply society trying to protect itself from the 1 %.

Dr. Minkmar: One key argument in your system of thinking is the role of central banks. And now today we think that central banks are there to supervise things and see that everything runs smoothly. But what would you advice central banks to do?

Prof. Hudson: Central banks began to be created in 1694 with the Bank of England, and down to the Federal Reserve in the United States in 1913 their function was to finance government budget deficits by printing money. All governments over time run deficits – at least, most of the time – because that is how they supply the economy with the purchasing power and the money it needs to grow. The role of a central bank is to create money to finance the deficit.

If it does not do this, then the commercial banks end up performing this function. However, the commercial banks creating credit on their own computer keyboards have a different role from that of the central bank. When the central bank finances government spending, this is supposed to promote growth, full employment and industrialization. But that is not the object of a commercial bank. Banks, in the first instance, make loans against property already in place – mainly real estate and also the buyout of entire corporations. So they provide credit that bids up the price of housing, making it more expensive for workers. They also loan to buyers of commercial buildings, making it more expensive to do business, Takeover loans enable corporate raiders to bid up the price of stocks and bonds, making them yield less, so it costs more to buy a retirement income. And now, commercial banks are moving from finance capitalism to casino capitalism to make big gambles. They are essentially financing gambling. That’s what derivatives and “hedge fund” trading are.

None of this funds industrial investment. From the United States to Germany, almost all industrial capital formation is now funded by the retained earnings of corporations, not by bank borrowing. Even the stock market does not fund new direct investments. It has become a vehicle for corporate raiders to go to the banks to borrow the money, to buy a corporation on credit with junk bonds, retire the stock, and use the corporate profits to repay the banks – and then try to steal for themselves the pension funds, or sell off the assets, or just work the labor force more intensively; longer hours, outsource labor and move to the un-unionized labor. So the banks are no longer part of the industrialization process; they are part of the de-industrialization process. This is applauded as the post-industrial economy.



Dr. Minkmar: You were talking about Europe as being the new third world as a model for politics …

Prof. Hudson: In the 1970s and 80s, the International Monetary Fund imposed austerity on indebted countries. The conditions were that if the countries did not pay their foreign debts, they would be treated like Cuba or Iran, and made into pariahs in the international community. So, they were forced to sell off and privatize.

When I worked for Chase Manhattan Bank in 1964, my first job was to analyze the economies of Argentina, Brazil and Chile. My job was to calculate/estimate how much potential they could export and raise, one way or another.

In Latin America it could only be imposed at gunpoint, as you saw in Chile. So the first privatization, the first free-market model, was imposed at gunpoint in Chile under general Pinochet, under the direction of Henry Kissinger and the Nixon administration, and the University of Chicago Economics Department under Harberger and other operatives down there.

Once they did that, the next big test was the former Soviet Union. Unlike the West, the Soviet Union had no background in Marxism. They had no group that was familiar with Marx and Engels or classical economics. So in 1991 they immediately adopted the neo-liberal approach that said: We can promote millionaires by privatizing the property. Many friends of mine tried to go over and promote a more reasonable tax system. The post-Soviet economies after 1991 would have financed themselves by taxing natural resource wealth and real estate. But as soon as these good advisors would go over there, right-wing institutes like the Lincoln Institute or the World Bank would come and tell the mayors of a town: We’ll give you a million dollars in computers if you follow our system and give the assets to your insiders to create a new nomenklatura of vested property interests – specifically, rentier interests, who would issue stocks in their companies and sell them to U.S. and other foreign investors. The idea was to let the West buy out the key rent-yielding assets in the former Soviet Union, above all mineral rights and public utilities, as well as centrally located real estate.

The government would put a deposit in one of the banks of the nomenklatura. In the Loans-for-shares program in 1994, the banks right say: 100 million dollars to buy Yukos oil company. The government would redeposit the check in the bank, so that they got the company for nothing, that is, no cash of their own. And then, when the government did not repay the debt, the bank would get many billion dollars worth of an oil or mining company.

The Americans did this because they realized that if a kleptocrat could buy Russian resources for one cent on the dollar, they would be happy to sell it for two cents on the dollar. That made the Russian stock market the best performing market in the world from 1994 to 1997. Russia let itself be financialized.

Other parts in the Soviet Union did not have raw materials. So a more accurate dress rehearsal would be what happened in Latvia, where they imposed a neo-liberal paradise. As in Russia, the neo-liberals had a free hand as to how to design what they said would be an ideal economy. Their way of creating such an economy and its financial and fiscal system was to say: “Don’t set up your own banks. Let foreign banks create the credit on their own keyboards.” Labor in Latvia has to confront a 59% set of flat taxes on employment – taxes that together are 59%. The real estate tax is only 1%, based on the most recent appraisal of Latvian property, which was in 1917 just before the revolution. So, the result was the largest real estate bubble of all.

That is basically the neo-liberal plan for how to get rich in a post-industrial economy. A property is worth whatever a bank will lend, because without taxes the value of this economic rent became available to be paid to the banks as interest rather than as taxes. The value of the site’s location should have been the basis of public financing, as in America. It’s the basis for most localities to pay for their school systems. If you are not going to tax property, if you are not going to tax monopolies, if you are not going to tax finance, then you have to tax labor. That’s why you have a 59% tax on employment in Latvia.

The result was an economic collapse in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. The result is that one third of the Latvian labor force of working age between 20 and 35 emigrated or announced its intention to emigrate. They would go to countries like Ireland which also was being financialized. So the Baltics still, even last year, were celebrated by the Institute for International Economics, the Peterson Institute, which is a bank lobbyist in the United States, and by the applauder of Russian privatization, Anders Aslund, the Swedish neoliberal lobbyist. Latvia is applauded as a model for which Europe should emulate. So you can expect your wages to be cut by 30%, you can expect people will have to go into a lifetime of debt in order to buy housing. They will have to have to inherit money if they want to get an education.

Dr. Schirrmacher: That is what you say about Europe?

Prof. Hudson: I said, if you follow the Latvian model. This is the ideal. The basic principle when I talk to bankers is: You don’t know how far wages can be pushed down until somebody pushes back. And so far, nobody has pushed back.

Dr. Schirrmacher: But what is with the unions? Normally …

Prof. Hudson: The communist countries did not have unions because they were supposed to be one big union. So the working conditions in the Baltic States have the worst accident rates, the worst workplace conditions, and their workers report the most abusive treatment by their employers. The workplace conditions in the post-communist economies are much worse than those in the capitalist economies, where there has been a symbiosis between labor and capital, a symbiosis between the private sector and the government.
….

Dr. Schirrmacher: Just, I mean, off the record, but one of the advisers of chancellor Merkel is sometimes amazing, and he keeps telling this. He says: No, don’t write that. He says: It’s illegal, it’s against the treaty. I mean, that’s his last argument. So, I would like to … from scientific point of view. Frau

Wagenknecht: You are insane … What do you say as a scientist to this question?

Prof. Hudson: Let’s simply look at the empirical facts. Since 2008 you have had the largest monetary creation in the 20th century’s history. The central banks have fueled this money creation. In America alone they have added $13 trillion dollars to the federal debt by bank bailouts. Yet prices have remained quite stable. Wages actually have fallen for the last 30 years, despite the wave of asset-price inflation fueled by commercial bank credit.

Central bank economists talk about consumer price or commodity price inflation. But commercial banks fuel asset price inflation, by lending money against real estate, stocks and bonds already in existence. As they make credit terms easier, people need more access to bank credit in order to buy a house. They have to bid against other. So bank credit inflates real estate prices. The upshot is that now you have to take more years of your income to buy a home. In the United States, the average American worker now pays 40% of family income for housing, 15% of income more for other debt service on credit cards and student loans. Another 15% is for wage withholding, and about another 15 % in other taxes, including sales taxes. This means that only about a quarter of American workers’ income is available to be spent on goods and services. Bank lending has absorbed so much of the income of workers that money that is spent to pay the banks is not available to be spent on goods and services.

So the flip side of asset price inflation is debt deflation. More and more money has to be spent to carry the debt overhead. The problem is not central banks financing domestic government budget deficits. Every hyperinflation in history has come as a result of the collapse of the balance of payments. The Germans are most familiar with 1921, but they tend to forget that the Weimar inflation was a result of Germany trying to pay reparations abroad. They were ordered by the Allied powers to print Deutsche Marks not for domestic spending, not to run a domestic deficit, not to rebuild Germany, not to employ labor, but to throw reichsmarks onto the foreign exchange market to obtain the foreign currency to pay the Allies, so that the Allies could turn around and pay the arms debts for what they bought from the United States before entry into World War One. It was the collapse of the foreign exchange that caused the hyperinflation, not domestic spending. And Germany’s hyperinflation was not cured by the central bank creating less money. It was cured by setting up a triangular flow of international payments. American bondholders would lend money to German municipalities that would issue bonds. The municipalities would receive dollars, and turn them over to the Reichsbank. It then would issue German currency against this for local spending – using the dollars to pay the Allies. The Allies would pay America, and that would keep the circular flow going. But to do this, interest rates had to be held down in the United States, to make German and other European borrowing more profitable for international lenders.

The same thing happened in Chile, which is another textbook hyperinflation. Rogers wrote a book on the process of hyperinflation in France that also occurred in the 1920s. The classic study of German inflation is by Salomon Flink, The Reichsbank and Economic Germany. The book actually was printed in Germany at that time. The same thing happened in Russia in the 1990s. The Russia hyperinflation occurred as a result of the depreciation of the ruble. This was already determined in advance at the meeting in Huston, Texas, between the World Bank and the IMF and the other Russian authorities. All this was published at the time, even before break-up of the Soviet Union. So to talk about hyperinflation as if it is a domestic phenomenon is to ignore the fact that never in history has it been domestic. It always is a balance-of-payments phenomenon, associated either with war or a class war, as in Chile’s case.
Dr. Schirrmacher: Now, to leave that economical …, to go to the interpretation of what will come. So, when I get it right, what you say, and Frau Wagenknecht says it too, there will be a … Wir werden ärmer. Also der durchschnittliche Deutsche wird verarmen oder ärmer.

Prof. Hudson: Impoverishment.

Dr. Schirrmacher: Right. And not a revolution, not a moment where the society says no? That’s my question. But at the same time, what we are observing is that it is not only a change of the social standards of human beings in Europe but of the whole idea of democracy as well. This is something that strikes me most, which I would never believed. I must say, ten years ago, I would have said: conspiracy. And many like me would have said that the banks are so powerful and so on. Now, we start thinking whether “conspiracy” is the right word for it. And the same with the democracy, democratic question. I learned at school that the “Soziale Marktwirtschaft”, as we termed it, definitely requires Pluralismus, Demokratie, Partizipation, all that. But, and that is my question, are we, as Colin Crouch writes, postulating a post-democratic system? Is one of the prizes we have to pay for it, that democracy becomes weaker and weaker, and isn’t that a very dangerous development?

….

Dr. Schirrmacher: Und da hätte ich eine Frage, die auch ganz aktuell ist, an Michael Hudson, vielleicht more in a theoretical way. Our new president said apparently, it is ridiculous to protest against, how did he say it, the capitalistic system, or something like that. Es ist lächerlich …

Wagenknecht: Nein, albern hat er …

Dr. Schirrmacher: Albern, ja, another word, it’s like ridiculous. And there we are, the point of question is, after the end of the communism, there was the idea, there is the triumph of capitalism. And now the people who are very social saying, I am repeating what they said in Germany: Now we can have a chance really, we don’t need the money for Rüstung anymore, and for armies, and against the Soviet Union, and so on. And now, we are in the third phase, and that’s why the (spot) that is so interesting, is the question: There is no alternative. Nobody really likes it, many people suffer. But the idea is, they managed to get the system like die beste aller möglichen Welten, there is no alternative to that all. What do you say to that, and what do you say to this quote?

Prof. Hudson: It is very interesting that the destruction of communism, or what passed for communism in 1990, made possible the destruction of industrial capitalism. What you have today is not capitalism as it was known when I grew up. It is not the capitalism that was talked about by Adam Smith, Ricardo, John Stuart Mill or even Marx. It is something that is evolved into finance capitalism, that is going through a number of stages. Pension-fund capitalism is exploiting labor, not by hiring it to produce goods and services, but to dock savings and channel them into the hands of financial managers – to bid up stock market prices.

Dr. Schirrmacher: Is it not the case, that this system did exist in the 20s?

Prof. Hudson: No, it only existed since 1950s. That is when General Motors started its pension fund. Pension funds soon became the single largest purchasers of stock, pushing up stock prices. The major sellers of stock have been management insiders, and increasingly those exercising their stock options, selling them in effect to the pension funds. So, the function of labor was to provide pension fund savings to spur stock market gains for the managers that have been financializing industrial companies – and in the process, de-industrializing them.

So, I’d like to plug this into the earlier discussion you just had. When you use the word “post-democratic society”, that is a byproduct of the post-industrial economy, which essentially means a financialized economy. It also was post-modern, if you think of “modern” as what existed in the early 20th century in the Progressive Era. That was the Modern Era. We are now in a post-modern era. The pro-financial strategy is essentially an anti-government strategy. That is because every economy is planned by someone or other. Most economies throughout history have been planned by the government, or whoever controls it, whether it’s been the landed aristocracy or bankers. If the government does not do the planning, this function is forfeited to the banks. And that is where we are today. Just like the case in which, if taxes are cut and the government does not get the revenue, it is available to be pledged to the banks and capitalized on the debt.

So the planning process passes to the banks, and they claim that they are the brains of society. They say, there is no alternative. But they are not the brain; they are something alien to industrial capitalism. This is what the Saint-Simon and his followers discussed in the 19th century. It was discussed in every country. The financial strategy now is to prevent people from studying what this body of classical economics was. It sought to free society from interest. Today’s banks are playing upon anxiety and fear, like a high-pressure salesman threatening to bring on a collapse if industrial economies try to protect themselves. They say: “You have to make up your decision in a hurry, if you don’t do this, you are going to lose your money, you are going to lose this opportunity.” They try to make it appear that this not only is the only alternative, but that it will make you rich.

Banks have been saying this for 30 years. This is the first time in history that people have believed they could get rich by borrowing money to buy assets that are increasing in price, or that they may get rich by the hyperinflation of property prices, and by the stock and bond prices that bank credit has inflated. Banks have managed to prevent the government from regulating and preventing this hyperinflation – and they even have called it “wealth creation.”

It is really debt creation. Debt is a claim on the means of production, and on labor. It is not a process of real growth. So what banks are saying is that there is no alternative but to let debts grow, at compound interest. This means reducing wages, as more and more must be spent on debt service. This eats into corporate cash flow and profits. So more and more are siphoned off to pay creditors. Debt also eats into the government revenue, so that the government does not have enough to pay for social programs and pensions. It only has enough to bail out the banks on exponentially growing debt that can never been paid, mathematically. That is the empirical fact. All you have to do is draw a statistical chart of the growth of debt, and compare it to the growth in wages. And you’ll see …

Dr. Schirrmacher: How do you explain from a business point of view … I take the example of Dresden. I was in Dresden two weeks ago, and there they explained to me, the people I met from the city and from Volksbank and all these … They explained to me that Dresden, which I didn’t know, sold parts of their Stadtwerke and so on, and bought it back now because they realized that it was a mistake. I hear this from many, many other cities. Now, in my understanding of society, someone apparently made mistake here, the people who sold this, or at least, put the pressure. And normally, you would have to pay a price for making a mistake, and society would say: How could this happen? But the contrary is true, first of all, nobody discusses this, I can’t see it in den Städten.

That’s the first. And the second is, the made a mistake but became rich, from what I see. They are not sanctioned at all. So, I always ask you for the gesellschaftlichen Folgen. Isn’t this something what really is the most frightening result of this new era that things we once learned when we were kids, are not true anymore? The question of, it’s not that you are sanctioned when you make mistakes but that you can benefit in this regard?

Prof. Hudson: This is a question that I have discussed in Russia and China with their leaders. Fortunately, there is an alternative that they are well aware of. There is a way to recover the property that has been turned over to the privatizers. The answer is very simple: a windfall gain tax or a rent tax. If the land is been privatized, as it has been in China and Russia, all you have to do is tax the land’s value – the natural value, not the building value, but just the economic rent. You will recapture for the state the free lunch of economic rent.

The same principle applies to mines and fuel resources. You will simply have a mineral depletion tax that will recapture the value of what nature has provided freely. So the alternative is for the government not to tax profits, not to tax wages, not to tax income, but to tax economic rent. Because what the national income account pretends to be empirical, pretends to be “earnings” of the banks and other rentiers, is actually a transfer function – and often, outright theft.

It’s remarkable that French novelists realize this, such as Balzac who said that behind every great family fortune is a great theft. Economists don’t rise to the level of 19th century French novelists when it comes to understanding the economy.

Dr. Schirrmacher: So to get back to your outlook again, talking about Europe, we have another debate that is quite interesting, which I think might be important to see. The one debate is, Greece is a lazy country and …, a new nationalism. The other one which I hear from bankers, by the way, sometimes, is, they say it ganz leise: It’s all America. So, it’s a huge American conspiracy. And they say: Wir wissen auch, dass das System nicht funktioniert, aber das ist ein amerikanischer Druck auf das, was jetzt mit Europa passiert usw. My question is, again, I think of Peter Hacks and Rahmentheorie. Ist das ein – das ist etwas, was ich für das Allerwichtigste halte – ein Prozess, der nicht mit einem big bang …


Dr. Schirrmacher: Das wäre Occupy. Will "Occupy" be a revolutionary agent?

Prof. Hudson: We’re not trying to be a revolutionary agent. We are in a pre-revolutionary situation, so the aim is to raise consciousness – at this point, simply to explain how the world works. And many people want to … They sense that the economy does not work the way that textbooks say. But they can’t reinvent the rules by themselves. So most of the reason “Occupy Wall Street” is on Wall Street is because that is where the problem is. And most of the financial advisers, like myself, are lifetime workers on Wall Street, specialists in financial maneuvering and behavior. So our job is to explain to people, to popularize what used to be classical economics. Right wing interests have inverted the classical idea of free markets and captured its vocabulary, hijacking the repertory of classical, socialist and social democratic rhetoric.

Dr. Schirrmacher: Exactly that is what they did.

Prof. Hudson: I want to comment on your earlier point. It is true that the parasitic financial dynamic stems from America. But that is official policy; it is not a secret. It is not a conspiracy, it is very open. I am told that when Mr. Geithner came here to meet with the German bankers about the Greek debt, the Germans and Mrs. Merkel were in favor of a default, saying: Look, they can’t pay. But Mr. Geithner said that the German and the French banks and other banks have taken out credit default insurance with the American banks. These American banks would go under if Greece defaulted. Mrs. Merkel agreed to sacrifice the German banks and to impose losses on the German banks in order to help America. She seems to have put American interests before her own national interest, and cost the German people hundreds of billions of dollars by doing this. It is as if the leaders of Europe are hypnotized by a kind of Dr. Caligari who ends up to be running the asylum.

Dr. Schirrmacher: (…) I think, it gives sehr große Einsichten, das ist faszinierend. The idea behind is, a little bit to … first of all to show that the position Frau Wagenknecht postulates, is not a position of two people in the world, but that there is a debate about it. And the other one is to provoke the others, the economists in Germany.

Prof. Hudson: You can’t provoke them.

Wagenknecht: Provoke you can, but …

Prof. Hudson: You can only replace them with a new generation.

Dr. Schirrmacher: What I found out, what they really need to understand them is psychology. Of course, they need media power, and the consensus. The idea that you are insane if you are questioning certain aspects.

Prof. Hudson: That is what Dr. Caligari said.

Dr. Schirrmacher: Yes, that’s right. Or Dürrenmatt, “Die Physiker”, that’s exactly the same. Economists are like “Die Physiker”.

Dr. Minkmar: Once you can put a label on them, like “umstritten,” and you’ve already won.

Prof. Hudson: Why do Hollywood movies understand this better than economists and politicians?

Dr. Schirrmacher: And why does Robert Harris? Did you read the book?

Prof. Hudson: Yeah, wonderful.

Dr. Schirrmacher: "Fear," Robert Harris
Admin · 33 views · 0 comments
27 Oct 2013
How to get rid of acne is a problem that has many people hunting for a good solution. No one likes living with acne on their skin.. The aggravated red pimples and lesions frequently significantly take away from someone's personal appearance and good looks



In addition, many people often apply unfair stereotypes to individuals who display acne The good news is, it's not hopeless to help yourself to get rid of acne. There are ways that it may be done.



Acne happens in a particular way. Grime, dead skin together with oil at times obstructs the sebaceous glands on your face that are responsible for making sebum. Then the bacteria which in turn prosper while in the congestion trigger an irritation of your skin which results in infected areas. The microorganisms responsible are usually found naturally upon our face and bodies, nevertheless in this particular situation they trigger our immune defences to operate in the infected spot.



As our white blood cells work, pus often fills the infected area. The ensuing inflammation is what we view on the surface of the skin as acne. In actual reality, the inflammation that seems visible today upon your skin has been a number of many days in it's gestation. So as you can see, it's a protracted developmental process that requires effort to get rid of.





The very first action when you'd like to get rid of acne involves preventative treatment. The microorganisms in acne have to be correctly treated in order to eliminate their presence. Recurrent cleaning with an anti-bacterial agent will be among the most significant things you can do in your attempt to stop your acne from spreading. A thorough clean with an efficient anti-acne wash twice a day will assist you to noticeably get rid of your acne. Care is necessary when applying hot water, either when cleansing your face or taking extended hot showers, because you can suffer a loss of a good deal of moisture from your skin while carrying out this. When cleansing the inflamed region, being careful is significantly better than going at it hard. Try to find the most suitable acne products that will preserve the moisture and integrity of the epidermis whilst killing microorganisms as well. Thorough treatment solutions which include multiple components are often more effective than any one item on it's own. Ensure that you budget appropriately since many treatment methods are a little pricey.





Additionally it is imperative to consider what you eat when attempting to get rid of acne. What you eat really should be a nutritious combination of all food groups with a good dose of fresh fruits and vegetables to get your skin acne free. Sugary snacks and greasy food products don't basically induce acne, but it really in no way hurts to eat right and care for your body. Consuming wholesome snacks is great to give your metabolism a boost during the day plus an ideal way to get a number of fruits and veggies into your regular diet.



There is no one answer for everyone. A number of solutions may deliver the results for some people, but may stimulate grumbles about their inadequacy from other people. So it might take a little bit of trying out to discover which system is best suited because even the most favored solution might not be beneficial for a few people. Give thought to your personal skin care and do not sit by while hoping for a remedy. Getting rid of acne is not necessarily easy within a brief length of time. Sustaining total epidermis health is important.



In case it is applicable to you, you should consider using oil free makeup products. These kinds have got less of a propensity to cause the actual pore accumulation that results in unhealthy skin. It is necessary to take your makeup off each night following use, and apply your acne facial cleanser to aid with the elimination of oil, grime and makeup from your pores and skin.



Coming in contact with your face often can easily spread your condition and ought to be prevented , but remember there are more things that come into contact with your skin than hands. Remember about your hair, pillowcases, and garments. Ensure that you keep your hair well cleaned, and out of your face. Be mindful to thoroughly clean your pillowcases properly. Don't squeeze your acne, it can cause it to become much more red-looking and spreads the microorganisms and sebum that are accountable for the condition. This can also cause scarring.Strive for healthier skin as opposed to looking for over night results that may not last.



So as to succeed in your quest to get rid of acne it is essential for you to keep working at it and adhere to an organised routine, so you ought to keep on trying regardless of how challenging it often appears. In the event that a product doesn't work then go on to another choice. Even the best treatments require time, therefore show patience and remain committed. Just take thorough care of your skin on a daily basis and the healthy and attractive skin you desire can be yours.








Admin · 63 views · 0 comments
Categories: First category
24 Apr 2013

Previous page  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next page